lithium’s role in Chile’s constitutional convention, the big thaw, climate and historical human crises, whales as a climate solution, Don’t Look Up
In Chile, the worldwide demand for lithium (which Chile has in abundance) has initiated a series of controversies and precipitated a constitutional convention. The New York Times reports that the convention will consider many things: "How should mining be regulated, and what voice should local communities have over mining? Should Chile retain a presidential system? Should nature have rights? How about future generations?" Facing a crippling drought supercharged by climate change, the convention also will decide who owns Chile’s water. The previous constitution, written in 1980 by Pinochet’s people, has produced an economy where mineral-rich areas became known as “sacrifice zones” of environmental degradation. The incoming president finds lithium mining a major issue he must consider.
The New York Times takes a detailed look at the Goro nickel mine in New Caledonia, with which Tesla has recently signed an agreement to purchase a major proportion of the nickel for its car batteries. The company seeks to brand this source as "green nickel", citing major changes in the mining operation that will reduce pollution (including greenhouse-gas emissions). Given the socio-political history of the mine, achieving this admirable and valuable goal will be a great challenge. The article notes that the carbon footprint of electric vehicles is relatively large because of the energy used to mine the metals contained in car batteries…
the threat from Thwaites, tornadoes and climate change, hacking the ocean, Build Back Better vital for climate goals, offshore-wind turbines get larger
A worrisome set of cracks has appeared in the surface of the ice shelf that is holding back part of the Thwaites glacier in Antarctica, notes the Washington Post. Scientists studying the ice shelf liken the cracks to those that can appear in a windshield, which can quickly spider-web across the entire surface and generate instability. This suggests the shelf could collapse in the next 3-5 years, which would accelerate the flow of the glacier into the ocean and consequently increase the rate of sea level rise. The Thwaites glacier already contributes 4% of global sea level rise annually.
As described by the New York Times, this is just one of several indicators of rapid shifts in Antarctica — changes that could complicate adapting to our new climate in the future. The article includes excellent animations and a history of scientific exploration of the Southern Ocean. This ocean, long a relative mystery because of its inhospitable conditions, is better-studied now due to the availability of remote instruments (including satellites). Scientists are documenting changes in wind patterns, ocean currents and water temperatures. These changes could result in the release of more carbon dioxide from the ocean as carbon-rich deep-ocean water is brought to the surface. In addition, this water is getting warmer, which increases the melting of ice shelves like the one in front of the Thwaites glacier.
The Washington Post notes that changes in the ice of Greenland are redefining the concept of "glacial pace." At the end of the last melt season, Greenland lost more ice than it gained for the 25th year in a row, and it rained at Greenland’s highest elevations. Rain on the ice sheet (instead of snow) also reduces the amount of solar energy reflected, which further accelerates melting. Another article in the Post states that the expected shift from snow to rain in Arctic regions, long predicted by climate scientists as the world warms, may arrive sooner than previously thought. This will have some significant consequences worldwide due to impact on sea levels, and the release of more greenhouse gases from soils and Arctic fires. An article at CNBC describes the ice loss being documented in the Himalayas, which threatens agriculture and water supplies for millions of people in South Asia…
sea level continues to challenge low-lying areas of Atlantic coast, fire and then floods in British Columbia and Australia, largest-ever order for solar panels in U.S., parking lots and landfills as solar-energy producers, federal government starts decarbonization push
An article in Grist revisits Tangier Island, in Chesapeake Bay. The island is slowly disappearing because of sea level rise and coastal erosion. These processes appear to be accelerating, and the latest study suggests that the island will be uninhabitable by 2051. The mayor of the island, James “Ooker” Eskridge, had a famous interaction with Al Gore during a CNN town hall when the mayor insisted that sea level rise was not a thing. Eskridge, a supporter of Donald Trump, said that Trump told him "not to worry about sea-level rise. Your island has been there for hundreds of years, and I believe your island will be there for hundreds more.” AP reports that Charleston, South Carolina, experienced the fourth-highest tide in 85 years of recording. What’s remarkable is that the other three highest levels happened during tropical storms or hurricanes. Another AP story describes the results of a recent election in Virginia Beach, where voters approved a new tax to support adaptation to rising sea level and intense flooding. This is evidence of the growing understanding that the problems of climate change are real.
A storm dropped a month’s worth of rain in two days across parts of British Columbia as described in an article in the Guardian. Said one resident, “Things that we just thought would always be there — like highway bridges that were built 30 years ago that were part of our life — were absolutely destroyed. Mountainsides just collapsed onto roads. The level of destruction is really difficult to comprehend.” This storm was one of several atmospheric rivers to strike the region recently. This type of precipitation event, which is replicated weekly across the planet now (i.e., Australia), is becoming more and more likely due the physical fact that a warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture. It is particularly dramatic to have these storms happening in southern British Columbia and Australia, areas also recently hammered by major heat and wildfire events.
U.N. climate meeting has its ups and downs, climate misinformation on Facebook, climate challenges for California agriculture, the dehydration of Arizona
The 26th Conference of the Parties (COP) to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has concluded in Glasgow with an agreement that makes at best modest progress addressing the problem. The New York Times notes that many issues remain unresolved (Yale Climate Connections calls these shortfalls "yawning gaps" and other "crevasses"). Under the Paris Accord, the parties were to arrive in Glasgow with updated pledges for reducing carbon emissions. While they did so, an investigation by the Washington Post documented that many countries are under-reporting their actual emissions, possibly as much as 23% in total. This suggests that efforts to reduce emissions have not been as successful as described—and we already know that, even if original targets had been met, they were not ambitious enough to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. In the Atlantic, Robinson Meyer notes that the nations’ actual policies lag even further behind their pledges. While the new pledges might keep global average temperature increases by 2100 to 2.4°C, policies are still at a level closer to 2.7°C, well beyond the more protective 1.5°C.
This has made many claim that the COP is just a waste of time. Greta Thunberg called the meetings "blah, blah, blah," and indigenous leaders were disappointed (although the concept of a "just transition" for less developed nations was an important part of the meeting). There is not, however, an alternative to COP to achieve the global transition, and as Meyer states, there’s more to COP than the math:
infrastructure for resilience to climate change, “nuisance flooding” is more than a nuisance, deforestation continues at record pace, climate change still concerns the Pentagon, Lovelock warns of GAIA’s revenge
An article in the New York Times describes the historic, bipartisan vote in the House of Representatives to pass President Biden’s “infrastructure bill,” which includes for the first time a major federal commitment to fund projects that build resilience to climate change. The bill contains $47 billion for projects around the country that increase flood protection, desalination, water recycling and flood and wildfire forecasting among many other provisions. The bipartisan nature of the vote, although meager (11 Republicans voted yes), is an unmistakable indicator that the reality of climate change is sinking in for Americans. In 2020, there were 22 climate disasters that cost at least $1 billion each, shattering the previous record of 16 events (set in 2017 and 2011), and that record is on track to be broken again this year. But, as Senator Whitehouse noted, this is only treating the symptoms of climate change. “It’s not enough to just do repair work,” he said, “we need to prevent the worse scenarios.” The President’s yet-to-be-passed Build Back Better plan contains vital funding for mitigation efforts.
An article in Anthropocene Magazine reports on research concluding that, from the perspective of climate action, it is better to drive your existing car for a few more years rather than replacing it with a moderately more efficient one. A major reason for this is that the greenhouse-gas impact of manufacturing is pretty hefty — responsible for nearly one-quarter of the cumulative carbon footprint of automobiles. When people hold on to their vehicles for longer, the reduced emissions from manufacturing more than cancel out the increased emissions from driving a slightly less-fuel-efficient older car…
we’re using too much fossil fuel, getting hot in Texas, the big fires are in Siberia, Senator Manchin throws gas on the global fire, EV sales booming
The Guardian reports on a recent study concluding that nearly 60% of the planet’s remaining oil and gas, and 90% of its coal reserves, must remain in the ground by 2050 for the world to have a shot at limiting global warming to 1.5°C. To meet the goals of the Paris agreement, researchers estimate oil and gas extraction must decline 3% each year until 2050, while every region of the world must reduce and eliminate coal extraction. The researchers acknowledge that their findings are "bleak."
A new United Nations report, however, projects that we’re moving in the opposite direction. An article in the New York Times reports its conclusion that 15 major fossil-fuel-producing countries (including the United States) are currently planning to produce more than twice as much oil, gas and coal through 2030 as would be needed if governments want to limit warming to 1.5°C. While coal extraction in China and the United States is expected to drop in the coming decades, the report notes that the decline would be offset by plans for new mining in places like Australia, India and Russia. An article in the New York Times notes that we have made progress in changing our future, as a feared 7°F rise by the end of the century no longer appears plausible, but we are still far from where we need to be…